RUSSIAN PUBLIC DIPLOMACY DURING THE ONGOING WAR IN UKRAINE: ACTORS AND INSTRUMENTS
Keywords:
Actors, Instruments, Russian, Public Diplomacy, Soft Power, UkraineAbstract
The Moscow-Kiev ongoing conflict has profoundly reshaped the geopolitical landscape of international relations with the West blaming Russia and NATO standing with Ukraine. This has prompted Moscow to redesign its public diplomacy strategies geared at counteracting western critics and fostering a favorable narrative. This article maps out those unique actors and instruments responsible for Russia’s public diplomacy in this context, piloted by an intricate nexus of state and non-state entities. Masterminding these actions are the Russian government, cultural and educational institutions, NGOs, Russian media, and online platforms. These organs are all tailored at disseminating information and influencing public opinion at home and abroad. Through the use and mobilization of its soft power mechanisms, Russia aims to project a status of strength and resilience while brushing aside western narratives and seeking to win friends. Understanding Moscow's public diplomacy strategies during this period is vital because of the geopolitical implications it has as the conflict unfolds. This article aims to outline the actors, instruments, and alongside the strategies employed by Moscow, thereby shedding light on the position of public diplomacy in contemporary warfare.
References
1. Açma, B., & Tekang, P. K. (2021). Turkish Public Diplomacy in a Decade: An Appraisal
and Prospects. Theoretical and Applied Issues of Economics, 1(41), 165-187.
2. Antwi-Boasiako, I. (2022). The quest for influence: Examining Russia’s public
diplomacy mechanisms in Africa. South African Journal of International Affairs.
3. As Russia Builds Influence in Africa, its Church Takes a Role.
https://www.usip.org/publications/2024/07/russia-builds-influence-africa-its-churchtakes-role
4. Bekim, B., Ngadhnjim, B., & Fjolla, N. (2013). Kosovar Public Diplomacy. ILIRIA
International Review, 3(1). https://doi.org/10.21113/iir.v3i1.106
5. Blitt, R. C. (2011). Russia’s “Orthodox” Foreign Policy: The Growing Influence of the
Russian Orthodox Church in Shaping Russia’s Policies Abroad. SSRN Electronic
Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1725522
6. Borshchevskaya, A. L. (2021). Russia’s Soft Power Projection in the Middle East. The
Washington Institute. Retrieved from https://www.washingtoninstitute.org/policyanalysis/russias-soft-power-projection-middle-east
7. Brown, J. (2010). Public Diplomacy: 'Out' for the U.S., 'In' Overseas? The Huffington
Post. Retrieved from http://www.huffingtonpost.com/john-brown/public-diplomacy-outfor_b_788931.html
8. Brown, R. (2011). Public Diplomacy and Social Networks. Paper prepared for the
International Studies Association Convention, Montreal, March 2011, from
http://www.allacademic.com//meta/p_mla_apa_research_citation/4/9/9/4/1/pages499410/
p499410-1.php
9. Braw, E. (2024). Russia is Waging Spiritual War in Africa. Foreign Policy.
https://foreignpolicy.com/2024/03/12/russia-africa-religion-orthodox-church-influence/
10. Chatham House. (2020). Russia's Soft Power: A Global Review. Chatham House.
11. Cull, N. J. (2009). Public Diplomacy: Lessons from the Past. Los Angeles, CA: Figueroa
Press.
12. Cull, N. J. (2019). The Tightrope to Tomorrow: Reputational security, collective vision
and the future of public diplomacy. The Hague Journal of Diplomacy, 14, 21–35.
https://doi.org/10.1163/1871191X-14011014
13. Dubtsova, N. (2024). From pulpit to propaganda machine: tracing the Russian Orthodox
Church’s role in Putin’s war. Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism.
14. Ekşi, M. (2019). Public Diplomacy and Soft Power in Recent Turkish Foreign Policy.
T.C. Anadolu University Publication No: 3944 Faculty of Open Education Publication
No: 2733 Turkish Foreign Policy I E-Isbn: 978-975-06-3643-1
15. Fischer, S. (2023). Diplomacy in the Context of the Russian Invasion of Ukraine:
Continuation of War by Other Means. European Union Institute for Security Studies.
Retrieved from https://www.iss.europa.eu/
16. Fiona, H. (2004). “Russia’s Newly Found Soft Power,” Brookings Institution, 26 August
2004, accessed 16 December 2024, https://www.brookings.edu/articles/russias-newlyfound-soft-power/
17. Gibson, L. (2023). The impact of citizen-led Facebook public diplomacy: A case study of
Libyans’ views of the US. Journal of Public Diplomacy, 3(2), 27-45.
https://doi.org/10.23045/jpd.2023.3.2.002
18. Gilboa, E. (2008). Searching for a theory of public diplomacy. Annals of the American
Academy of Political and Social Science, 616(1), 55-77.
https://doi.org/10.1177/0002716207312142
19. Gilboa, E. (2023). Moving to a new phase in public diplomacy research. In E. Gilboa
(Ed.), A research agenda for public diplomacy (pp. 1-23). Edward Elgar Publishing.
https://doi.org/10.4337/9781802207323.00007
20. Government meeting. (2024). government.ru. http://government.ru/en/news/53548/
21. Jowett, G. S., and V. O’Donnell. 2012. Propaganda and Persuasion, 5th ed. Thousand
Oaks, CA: Sage.
22. Ikenberry, G. J. (2020). Review of Soft Power: The Means to Success in World Politics,
by Joseph S. Nye Jr., Foreign Affairs 83, no. 3 (May/June 2004), accessed 16 November
23. Khmilevskaya, E. (2021). Russkiy Mir Expanding its Activities into Asia and Africa.
Modern Diplomacy. https://moderndiplomacy.eu/2021/05/22/russkiy-mir-expanding-itsactivities-into-asia-and-africa/
24. Keohane, R. O. & Nye, J. S. (1998). Power and Interdependence in the Information Age.
Foreign Affairs.
25. Kravchuk, V. (2024). Russia to spend $118 million per month on state propaganda in
2025 - Euromaidan Press. https://euromaidanpress.com/2024/10/07/russia-to-spend-118-
million-per-month-on-state-propaganda-in-2025/
26. Leonard, M., Stead, C., & Smewing, C. (2002). Public Diplomacy. London: The Foreign
Policy Centre.
27. Luther, C. & Prins, B. (2024). How Russia employs ‘hard soft power’ to influence
overseas media and sow dissent and fear among foreign populations. The Conversation.
28. Mearsheimer, J. J. (2014). Why the Ukraine Crisis is the West's Fault: The Liberal
Delusions that Provoked Putin. Foreign Affairs, 93(5), 77-89.
29. Melissen, J. (2011). Beyond the New Public Diplomacy. The Hague: Clingendael Paper
30. Number 3.
31. Melissen, J., (ed.). (2005). The New Public Diplomacy: Soft Power in International
Relations. New York: Palgrave-MacMillan.
32. Nye, J. S. (2004). Soft Power: The Means to Success in World Politics. Public Affairs.
33. Nye, J. S. (2008). The Powers to Lead. Oxford University Press.
34. Nye, J. S. (2011). The Future of Power. New York: Public Affairs.
35. Olga, K. (2019). Review - Russia’s Public Diplomacy: Evolution and Practice. EInternational Relations. https://www.e-ir.info/2019/10/22/review-russias-publicdiplomacy-evolution-and-practice/ accessed on 27.12.2024.
36. Osmonalieva, B. (2024). Russia to triple spending on promotion of Russian language
abroad.
https://24.kg/english/307028_Russia_to_triple_spending_on_promotion_of_Russian_lan
guage_abroad/
37. Petrova, M., & de Bievre, D. (2019). Russia’s Media Strategy in Ukraine: Soft Power and
Disinformation. European Journal of Communication, 34(3), 232-245.
38. Politics Today. (2023). How Russia Instrumentalizes Orthodoxy in Africa. Politics
Today. https://politicstoday.org/russia-orthodox-church-africa/
39. Pomerantsev, P. (2014). Nothing is True and Everything is Possible: The Surreal Heart
of the New Russia. PublicAffairs.
40. Ray, C. (2024). Russian Orthodox Church Viewed as Tool to Spread Kremlin Influence.
Africa Defense Forum. https://charlesray-author.com/index.php/2024/11/24/russianorthodox-church-viewed-as-tool-to-spread-kremlin-influence/
41. Rodeheffer, L. (2024). Kremlin Prioritizes Russian Language in Moscow’s Near Abroad.
jamestown.org. https://jamestown.org/program/kremlin-prioritizes-russian-language-inmoscows-near-abroad/
42. RT. (2024). Russia to boost spending on language promotion abroad.
https://www.rt.com/russia/605165-russia-spending-language-promotion-abroad/
43. Russia in Africa - Africa Center for Strategic Studies (2022). https://africacenter.org/infocus/russia-in-africa/
44. Russkiy Mir Expanding its Activities into Asia and Africa. (2021).
https://moderndiplomacy.eu/2021/05/22/russkiy-mir-expanding-its-activities-into-asiaand-africa/
45. Russia’s Global Image: Another Casualty of the War? - ISPI. (2022).
https://www.ispionline.it/en/publication/russias-global-image-another-casualty-war-
34896
46. Seib, P. (2012). Real-Time Diplomacy: Politics and Power in the Social Media Era.
New York: Palgrave-MacMillan.
47. Seib, P. (2009). Towards a New Public Diplomacy: Re-directing U.S. Foreign Policy.
New York: Palgrave-MacMillan.
48. Shakirov, O. (2013). "Russian Soft Power Under Construction." E-International
Relations, February 14, 2013. https://www.e-ir.info/2013/02/14/russian-soft-powerunder-construction/
49. Simons, G. (2020). Russian Foreign Policy and Public Diplomacy: Meeting 21st Century
Challenges. Вестник Российского университета дружбы народов. Серия:
Международные отношения, 20(3), 491-503. DOI: 10.22363/2313-0660-2020-20-3-
491-503
50. Simons, G. (2018). The Role of Russian NGOs in New Public Diplomacy. Journal of
Political Marketing, 17:2, 137-160. https://doi.org/10.1080/15377857.2018.1447755
51. Simons, G. (2011). “Attempting to Re-Brand the Branded: Russia’s International Image
in the 21st Century.” Russian Journal of Communication 4 (¾):322–350.
52. Snow, C. (Jr). (2006). “Public Diplomacy Practitioners: A Changing Cast of Characters.”
Journal of Business Strategy 27 (3):18–21.
53. Snow, N. (2010). “Public Diplomacy: New Dimensions and Implications.” In Global
54. Communication: Theories, Stakeholders and Trends, edited by Thomas, L. McPhail,
84–102, 3rd ed. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell.
55. Snow, N., and Taylor, P. (2009). Routledge Handbook of Public Diplomacy. New York:
Routledge.
56. Szondi, G. (2008). Public Diplomacy and Nation Branding: Conceptual Similarities and
Differences. Discussion Papers in Diplomacy: Netherlands Institute of Inter- national
Relations Clingendael. Retrieved from http://ts.clingendael.nl/publications/2008/20081022_pap_in_dip_nation_branding.pdf
57. Snow, N., & Taylor, P. M. (2008). “Routledge Handbook of Public Diplomacy”,
published in association with the USC Center on Public Diplomacy at the Annenberg
School based at the University of Southern California, first published 2009, this edition
published in the Taylor & Francis e-Library.
58. SPIEF 2024 to Discuss Russia’s Main Development Goal. (2024).
59. St. Petersburg International Economic Forum. (2024). https://forumspb.com/
60. Statista Research Department. (2024). Russia: leading charity NGOs by funds raised |
Statista. Statista. https://www.statista.com/statistics/1149179/leading-charity-ngos-inrussia/
61. Sukhorolskyi, P., & Sukhorolska, I. (2024). “The Public Diplomacy of Ukraine in
Wartime: A Path to Reputational Security.” Eastern Journal of European Studies, 15(SI),
268. DOI: 10.47743/ejes-2024-SI13
62. TASS. (2015). Promotion of Russian language abroad strategically important for Russia
— concept. https://tass.com/politics/834473 accessed on 12.11.2024.
63. Taylor, M., Rice, N. M., Manaev, O., Luther, C. A., Allard, S. L., Bentley, R. A., Borycz,
J., Horne, B. D., & Prins, B. C. (2024). Russian Public-Diplomacy Efforts to Influence
Neighbors: Media Messaging Supports Hard-Power Projection in Ukraine and Georgia.
International Journal of Communication, 18. Retrieved from
https://ijoc.org/index.php/ijoc/article/view/20828
64. “The Foreign Policy Concept of the Russian Federation” (2013). Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the Russian Federation, 18 February 2013.http://www.mid.ru/foreign_policy/official_documents/-
/asset_publisher/CptICkB6BZ29/content/id/122186.
65. The BRICS Summit 2024: An Expanding Alternative. (2024).
https://www.cfr.org/councilofcouncils/global-memos/brics-summit-2024-expandingalternative
66. Ventura, S. (2024). War and Its Imagery: The Visual Narrative of the Ukrainian State’s Instagram Account Ukraine. Use as a Tool of Digital Public Diplomacy.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Journal of Linguistics, Literature & Communication Studies
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
