E-Contracts and the Applicability of the Contract Act, 1872 in the Digital Era
Keywords:
E-Contracts, Indian Contract Act, Digital Consent, Smart Contracts, Legal Reform, Cyber Law, Bluebook. I. IntroductionAbstract
The emergence of electronic contracts (e-contracts) has redefined the formation, execution, and enforcement of contracts in the digital age. In India, the legal framework governing e-contracts is primarily shaped by the Indian Contract Act, 1872 and supplemented by the Information Technology Act, 2000. However, the Contract Act—enacted in the 19th century—was not designed to accommodate the nuances of digital transactions, such as smart contracts, click-wrap agreements, and cross-border automated performance. This article critically examines the applicability of the Contract Act to e-contracts, exploring doctrinal challenges in offer, acceptance, consent, and consideration within digital environments. Through a comparative analysis of jurisdictions such as the United States, the United Kingdom, the European Union, and Singapore, the study highlights global best practices. It identifies key legislative and judicial gaps in the Indian context. The paper further examines the judicial responses in India and proposes targeted reforms to modernise the legal treatment of electronic contracts. Recommendations include legislative amendments, enhanced consumer protections, judicial specialisation, international harmonisation, and public awareness initiatives. The article concludes that without systematic legal reform, India risks undermining the enforceability and integrity of digital contracts, impeding both domestic innovation and international commercial engagement.
References
See Pollock & Mulla, The Indian Contract Act and Specific Relief Acts 13 (R.Y. Narayanan ed., 15th ed. 2017)
The Indian Contract Act, No. 9 of 1872, §§ 2, 10, India Code (1872).
The Information Technology Act, No. 21 of 2000, §§ 4–5, India Code (2000).
Id.
Indian Contract Act § 13.
Id. §§ 3–4.
Trimex Int' l FZE Ltd. v. Vedanta Aluminium Ltd., (2010) 3 S.C.C. 1 (India).
Bharat Sanchar Nigam Ltd. v. BPL Mobile Cellular Ltd., (2008) 13 S.C.C. 597 (India).
See Electronic Signatures in Global and National Commerce Act, 15 U.S.C. §§ 7001–7031 (2000); Regulation 910/2014, of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 July 2014 on Electronic Identification and Trust Services for Electronic Transactions in the Internal Market, 2014 O.J. (L 257) 73.
Ministry of Electronics and Information Technology, India’s Trillion-Dollar Digital Opportunity (2022), https://www.meity.gov.in.
John Austin, The Province of Jurisprudence Determined (1832); H.L.A. Hart, The Concept of Law 97–107 (2d ed. 1994).
H.L.A. Hart, supra note 1, at 100–01.
Id. at 117–21.
P.S. Atiyah, The Rise and Fall of Freedom of Contract 10–14 (1979).
See Samuel Williston, A Treatise on the Law of Contracts (1920); Arthur L. Corbin, Corbin on Contracts (1950).
Indian Contract Act, 1872, §§ 2(h), 10, 13, India Code (1872).
Mark A. Lemley, Terms of Use, 91 Minn. L. Rev. 459, 467–70 (2006).
Trimex Int’l FZE Ltd. v. Vedanta Aluminium Ltd., (2010) 3 S.C.C. 1 (India).
Specht v. Netscape Commc’ns Corp., 306 F.3d 17, 30–32 (2d Cir. 2002).
Jerome Frank, Law and the Modern Mind (1930); Karl Llewellyn, The Bramble Bush (1930).
Nancy Kim, Wrap Contracts: Foundations and Ramifications 56–63 (2013).
Nguyen v. Barnes & Noble Inc., 763 F.3d 1171, 1175–78 (9th Cir. 2014).
See Google India Pvt. Ltd. v. Visaka Industries, (2020) 4 S.C.C. 162 (India); M/S Carlsberg India Pvt. Ltd. v. Hindustan Packaging Co., 2023 SCC OnLine Del 148.
Terry Hutchinson, Doctrinal Research: Researching the Jury, 17 Griffith L. Rev. 39, 40–43 (2008).
See Pollock & Mulla, The Indian Contract Act and Specific Relief Acts (R.Y. Naraynan ed., 15th ed. 2017); Avtar Singh, Law of Contract and Specific Relief (12th ed. 2017).
Electronic Signatures in Global and National Commerce Act, 15 U.S.C. §§ 7001–7031 (2000); Uniform Electronic Transactions Act (Nat’l Conf. of Comm’rs on Unif. State Laws 1999); Electronic Communications Act, 2000, c. 7 (UK); Electronic Transactions Act 2010 (Sing.).
Ministry of Electronics and Information Technology, India’s Trillion-Dollar Digital Opportunity (2022), https://www.meity.gov.in; UNCITRAL, Model Law on Electronic Commerce (1996), https://uncitral.un.org
Rolf H. Weber, The Digital Transformation of the Legal Sphere: E-Contracts and Blockchain, 25 Eur. J. L. & Tech. 77, 78–80 (2020).
Information Technology Act, No. 21 of 2000, §§ 4–5, India Code (2000).
Id. § 10-A.
Indian Contract Act, 1872, § 10, India Code (1872).
Nancy Kim, Wrap Contracts: Foundations and Ramifications 35–42 (2013).
Trimex Int’l FZE Ltd. v. Vedanta Aluminium Ltd., (2010) 3 S.C.C. 1 (India).
Feldman v. Google Inc., 513 F. Supp. 2d 229, 237–39 (E.D. Pa. 2007).
Indian Contract Act § 13.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Journal of Political Science, Law & Governance
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
