Profile and Nature of Pedagogy as a Scientific Discipline
Keywords:
Education of the Person, Science of Education, Educational Research, Methodology of Educational Labor, Pedagogical ConceptsAbstract
The purpose of this work is to describe and explain the characteristics of pedagogy as a science of education, as an object, concepts and research method. The methodology assumed was the review of the history of pedagogy, especially the classics of pedagogy, those who built it with their experiences in laboratory schools. Here are listed the main concepts of pedagogy, its laws and principles; she establishes the opposition that exists between teaching-learning and education as formation of the personality; she also delimits the fields of the pedagogical method, of didactics or teaching-learning, and the methodology of educational labor that organizes the process and the educational context, the regime and the lifestyle, such as those experienced in the “colonies” or “communes” of children and adolescents, organized and directed by Neill and Makarenko. Since the present article does not derive from a primary source or from field work, as an empirical or experimental research, the results constitute the content of the article, as conclusions.
References
1. Ausubel, D., Novak, J. and Hanesian, H. (1978). Educational Psychology: A Cognitive View, NewYork. Bruner, J. (1995). From Joint Attention to the Meeting of Minds. In C. Moore and P. Dunham (Eds.), New York. Caro Ríos, G. (1965). Escuelas de estudio y trabajo enco
educación,Editorial Pedagógica Asencios, Lima.
2. Comenio, J. (2012). Didáctica Magna, EditorialAkal Porrúa, Madrid.
3. Cousinet, Roger. (1967). Une méthode de travail libre par groupes, Éditions du Cerf, París.
4. Decroly, O. and Monchamp, E. (1978). El juegoeducativo: iniciación a la actividadintelectual y motriz, Ed. Morata, Colección Psicología.
5. Delors, Jacques. (1996). La educación encierra un tesoro, Madrid, Santillana Ediciones UNESCO.
6. Encinas, J. (2022). Un Ensayo de Escuelanueva en el Perú, Fondo Editorial de la Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos. Lima.
7. Ferrer Guardia, F. (1976). La Escuela Moderna, Ediciones Júcar, Madrid.
8. Freinet, C. (1971). Laescuela Popular Moderna, Retablodepapelediciones, Lima. Freire, Paulo. (1976). La educación Como Practica de la Libertad, Siglo XXI Madrid. Goodman, Paul. (1976). La Des-educación Obligatoria, Fontanella, Barcelona.
9. Ilich, Iván. (2012). La sociedad desescolarizada, Editorial Godot, Buenos Aires.
10. Kilpatrick, Rugg and Washburne y Bonner. (1967). El nuevo Programa Escolar, Editorial Losada, Buenos Aires.
11. Kluckhohn, Clyde. (1969). La personalidad en la naturaleza, la sociedad y la cultura,
Unaantología de ensayos.
12. Ediciones Grijalbo, México.
13. Makarenko, A. (1977). La colectividad y la educación de la personalidad. Editorial Progreso, Moscú.
14. Malson, L. and YItard, J. (1973). Losniñosselváticosy Memoriassobre VictordeL’Aveyron, Alianza Editorial, Madrid. Mead, Margaret. (1985). Educacióny Culturaen Nueva Guinea, Paidósibérica, Madrid.
15. Montessori, Maria. (2023). The Montessori Method, Fredrick A. Stokes Company, New York. En:http:// digital.library.upenn.edu/women/montessori/method/method.html
16. Neill, A.S. (1986). Summerhill, Fondode Cultura Económica, México.
17. Palacios, L. (2008). Lógica de la ciencia e investigacióneducativa, Fondo editorial delpedagógico San Marcos. Lima. Pestalozzi, Juan. (2004). Cómo Gertrudes enseña a sus hijos, Porrua, Mexico.
18. Piaget, Jean. (2001). Psicologiay Pedagogía, Crítica. Barcelona. Rousseau. (2011). Emilioola Educación, Alianza Editorial, Madrid.
19. Vigotsky, L. (2012). Fundamentosdedefectología, Antonio Machado Libros, Bogotá. Washburne, C. (1968). Winnetka, Editorial Losada, BuenosAires.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Innovations in Education, Learning & EdTech
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
